Each proposal will be reviewed by two members of a blind review committee. The peer review process will include feedback and, possibly, specific suggestions for each submission. Submitters will be notified by March 2017 of the selection of sessions. You may be asked to take such feedback into account, and to revise and resubmit your proposal before a final decision is made. If you are not available in March to participate in this integral part of the selection process, please let us know in advance.
Reviewers will rate each proposal in five categories (each worth five points):
We will select the proposals that have the highest point values overall:
We encourage reviewers to provide comments intended to help proponents improve their submissions. Please note that any text included in the comments section will be shared with proponents. Please use the following guidelines when writing suggestions and comments:
The peer review process for this conference is anonymous: proposals are forwarded to reviewers without identifying information in as much as that is possible.
If you have any questions about the conference, please contact the Conference Planning Committee at firstname.lastname@example.org.